[BikeLongmont] LAB Bicycling Friendly Communities
Richard Masoner
Richard.Masoner@nsc.com
Mon, 01 Dec 2003 16:51:23 -0700
Devin Quince wrote:
>One example is that I was riding to work on Monday and no bike path I normally take to work was cleared on smow or ice.
>
It would be nice of the city would clear the paths; a survey of the
path-plowing practices of snow belt award winners would be interesting.
Nevertheless, since anything besides arterials and a few collectors
aren't plowed in this city, the city's snow-plowing policy seems
equitable and reasonable to me; especially given your sig:
>Cyclists should expect and demand
>safe
>accommodation on our public roads,
>just as does every other user.
>
>Nothing more is expected.
>
Len DeMoss wrote:
>Certainly no comparison between Longmont and Boulder when it comes ot being a bike friendly city.
>
Longmont can learn some lessons from Boulder, but I wasn't comparing
Longmont to Boulder; I was comparing Longmont with the qualifications
for LAB's Bike Friendly Community. I've been to some of the cities that
have received the award, and Longmont seems to compare favorably. For
example, Fort Collins (which received the award) claims something like
200 miles of facilities, but they also seem to have a high proportion of
"Get off the road" anti-cycling cagers, not to mention those homicidal
teens pegging cyclists with baseball bats last year. Denver also
received the award, probably because of their nice path network, and I
love their "sharrow" innovation, but "Share the Road" seems to have no
meaning for many motorists in Denver. They'd just as soon shoot you as
allow you some room on the road.
In Longmont, OTOH, the motorists are very courteous to cyclists. The
city staff all seem to bend over backwards to address cyclist concerns.
The police are active in checking up on cyclist complains of aggressive
motorists. Members of this advocacy lists are on the city staff and
address the concerns that are raised here. City staff do a great job
communicating with the members of this list. *That* is absolutely
invaluable.
As Buzz notes, however, there are certainly opportunities for
improvement. I think that if Longmont achieves some of the minimal
requirements for receiving a Bicycling Friendly award, then the city
could make improvements where applicable, get the award, and use that to
kick start some media campaigns to push for greater public awareness of
cyclists rights and the benefits to the community that cycling has.
Len DeMoss wrote:
>What bike lanes there are are not taken care
>of. I typically do not ride the bike lanes in the city only because there's
>lots of gravel and glass in the lanes.
>
I think dirt in the lane would be number one on my list of opportunities
for improvement. Get rid of the stripes but leave the bike symbols and
cars would drive in the "bike lane" and sweep the dirt away. :-)
RFM